|
Why body pierce?
Piercing the human
body has a long and varied history dating back to prehistoric times, and is
still customary in some cultures throughout the world. Modern so-called 'civilised'
man has discovered the benefits that piercing can bring, the reasons being many
and varied. For many it is purely fashion, for others a sign of status in society
and for some a means of heightening sexual pleasure. Whatever the reason, body
piercing is racing around the world, heightening the demand for both piercing
and piercing equipment.
|
|
|
Before any attempt
can be made to discuss the origins of contemporary body piercing it is important
to understand the global origins of piercing. It is from these roots that this
art form has evolved and they reflect the attitudes many people hold towards
the practise. Body piercing is ancient and, I feel rightly, according to Ted
Polhemus "arguably the most widespread of all the permanent (semi-permanent)
body arts" (Polhemus 1996). The names and origins of all the types of piercings
now practised is a subject covered in more depth in other publications such
as Eye of the Needle or Modern Primitives. However, it is worth noting some
facts to provide background.
Piercing is known
to have been practised by the Romans, who used nipple piercings as a sign of
bravery and functionally as a means of attaching cloaks. The Karma Sutra refers
to the apadravya, a genital piercing, whilst a similar piercing, the
Apadravya
ampallang (a horizontally orientated apadravya), is said to have originated
in Borneo and in particular is associated with the Dyak tribe (Eye of the Needle).
The Carafa Indians of South America wear a thin cane in the lower lip, this
denotes one being in their prime of life (Clarke 1994 p109). In Africa similar
decorations can be found worn by the women but they are stretched to huge sizes,
a possible theory as to the extent the piercing is taken to is that it was used
to discourage the slave trade. Modern body piercing then, consists of an amalgam
of body art from ancient and present day non-industrialised societies coupled
with modern hygiene and piercing techniques. This has given rise to new, and
more technically difficult, piercings such as the diath and rook invented by
Eric Dakota and even more extreme the piercing of the uvula. Many types of piercings
possible are show in the illustrations section.
Piercing in the
UK was, as noted above, originally limited to a variety of fringe groups, most
notably the punks, 'travellers' and members of the sadomasochistic scene. These
groups are by no means the only ones which practised body piercing, nor are
the names assigned to them meant to be especially descriptive, they are meant
purely to give a general indication of the fringe position which body piercing
held.
The sudden and
marked change in the nature of body piercing occurred about three to four years
ago. This change was brought about by a number of factors but most notably the
uptake of navel and eyebrow piercings by the fashion world, the piercing of
the eyebrow of a member of the 'boy band' Take That and the increased amount
of exposure given to the fetish scene on British television. These factors had
three main effects. Firstly they made piercing fashionable to the general public,
secondly they opened up the realm of extreme, as opposed to fashion, body piercing
to people who had never realised it was possible and thirdly, people who had
been piercing their own bodies for years were made aware of the extent to which
the practise was widespread
Skin piercing is not merely a follow up to the punk fashion of the 70's. Its
increasing popularity has been helped by fashion gurus such as Jean Paul Gaultier
who connects pierced ear and pierced nose with high class jewellery and Naomi
Cambell who displays her pierced navel. Furthermore, history is repeating itself;
the Romans needed their nipples pierced - What else could they attach their
cloaks to when going off to war. How else could Prince Albert be reassured of
that 'smooth look' when wearing his fashionable tight trousers if he was unable
to hook his penis to the back of his leg? Finally, the French Aristocrats were
wild about it, both males and females saw it as a high class trend in the 18th
century.
|